Latest Lucid Air Dream Edition Review Proves That It’s Something Very Special

The all-electric Lucid Air may come from an automaker with no prior experience building cars but it has proven itself to be one of the finest electric vehicles on the market.

A bunch of journalists have had the opportunity to drive the Lucid Air over the past couple of months and most recently, the guys from Throttle House in Canada headed to California to put the Lucid Air Dream Edition Performance variant through its paces. They walked away from the review seriously impressed.

Powering this flagship variant of the Lucid Air are two electric motors that combine to produce 1,111 hp. It is the most performance-focused variant of the Air but it still offers a range of 471 miles (758 km). Those who don’t need all 1,111 hp can also purchase the Air Dream Edition in Range guise with 933 hp and 520 miles (837 km) of range.

Read Also: Lucid Makes The Very First Customer Deliveries Of The All-Electric Air

While testing the electric sedan, Throttle House notes that it feels like a luxury car first which is quite a bold statement considering the phenomenal performance that it offers. The Lucid Air also weighs several hundred pounds more than a Tesla Model S Plaid but despite that, it controls its mass incredibly well and offers up loads of grip and gives the driver heaps of confidence. Unlike the Model S Plaid, it also has a set of brakes that match the insane straight-line performance.

The Lucid Air has received a lot of praise recently and was even named as Motor Trend’s Car of the Year. Unlike some other electric vehicles, it has also started to reach the hands of customers and proves that while Tesla continues to dominate the EV market, it now has some serious rivals to worry about.

[embedded content]

For GREAT deals on a new or used Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep or RAM check out LA CDJR TODAY!

Driven: The 2022 Ford Maverick Is Proof Big Things Come In Small Packages

Amazing. That’s about the only way you can describe the 2022 Ford Maverick as the pickup starts at $19,995 and comes with a hybrid powertrain that allowed us to average 49 mpg (4.8 lt/100 km) in real-world testing.

That’s insane, but it’s only the tip of the iceberg as the Maverick is so much more than an affordable, fuel-sipping pickup. In particular, it has an impressively designed cabin, great driving dynamics, and an available EcoBoost engine that allows the truck to tow up to 4,000 lbs (1,814 kg).

Ford has distilled decades of truck leadership into an affordable package that offers crossover comfort, pickup capability and the fuel economy of a small sedan. It’s an undeniable home run and the more than 100,000 people who have reserved one can expect great things in the future.

They’re Cute When They’re Small

Truck design has been trending towards aggressive and imposing, but the Maverick charts a different course as it features a relatively simple and straightforward design.

It looks pretty basic in XL trim as the entry-level model features a black mesh grille and 17-inch steelies. Buyers will also find C-shaped LED headlights and a black grille bar, which encompasses the front turn signals.

Moving further back, there’s plastic body cladding, faux fender vents, and a greenhouse which eschews Ford’s familiar “drop-down” side windows.Designers attempted to replicate the latter with a front door accent, but it’s barely noticeable.

The mid-level XLT adds 17-inch aluminum wheels and a gray grille bar, while the range-topping Lariat is distinguished by a silver bar, additional body-color components and larger 18-inch alloy wheels.

Of course, talk about the Maverick wouldn’t be complete without mentioning how small it is. The model measures 199.7 inches (5,072 mm) long, which makes it 11.1 inches (282 mm) shorter than the Ranger and 32 inches (813 mm) shorter than the F-150.  This has a number of benefits including the ability to fit in garages.

While the Maverick is relatively compact, it’s larger than the Hyundai Santa Cruz. As we noted in our review last month, the Hyundai is 4 inches (102 mm) shorter and 2.4 inches (61 mm) wider than the Blue Oval’s competitor. The Santa Cruz is also 2 inches (51 mm) lower and has a 2.8 inch (71 mm) shorter wheelbase.

A Bed For The DIY Crowd

When it comes to trucks, it’s impossible to ignore the bed and the Maverick has a 4.5 foot FlexBed with a payload capacity of 1,500 lbs (680 kg). While the bed is quite a bit smaller than traditional pickups, it has a cargo capacity of 33.3 cubic feet (943 liters) and is more flexible than its size suggests.

Since the Maverick was designed for doers, the truck has been equipped with a multi-position tailgate that features a mid-position which lines the top of the tailgate up with the top of the wheel wells. This enables owners to carry 4×8 sheets of drywall or plywood.

Speaking of wood, there are stamped slots in the bed to allow owners to insert 2x4s or 2x6s. With these boards in place, owners can separate and secure cargo as well as make a ‘false’ floor to allow for two layers of storage.

[embedded content]

Of course, that’s just part of the story as the Maverick comes standard with six cargo tie downs. The XLT ups the ante by adding four extra tie downs and a storage cubby on the passenger side, while the Lariat boasts storage cubbies on both sides.

Customers can also opt for bed rails, a spray-in bedliner and LED lighting. Other options include a 110-volt outlet, tonneau covers and a bed extender.

One of the more interesting things about the Maverick is that it was designed with customization in mind. In particular, the truck comes standard with two prewired 12-volt connections to allow for DIY electrical projects such as custom bed lighting or the installation of onboard air. Ford is encouraging customers to get creative and they can scan a QR code in the bed to get some ideas.

Speaking of DIY, owners don’t need to shell out for factory side rails as they can simply get some C-channel and bolt it to the bed. The aforementioned QR code will also show people how to build a bike rack as Ford believes customers would rather spend money on the mountain bike rather than the rack to get it to the mountains.

A Surprisingly Stylish Cabin

Given the Maverick’s affordable pricing, it comes as little surprise the interior is filled with hard plastic. However, Ford’s interior design team deserves a lot of credit as they got creative with the cabin.

Instead of the usual sea of black plastic, there’s a multi-color interior that is unique to each trim. The Navy Pier and Medium Slate interior in the mid-level XLT is particularly fetching as it features stylish blue and grey accents with orange flourishes. The range-topping Lariat is also pleasing on the eyes as it boasts leather-like ActiveX upholstery and bronze accents.

The colors aren’t the only notable thing about the interior as the doors have split armrests, which allow them to accommodate large water bottles such as those sold by Yeti and S’well. The door pockets are also large enough to store tablets, while the low center console offers numerous storage compartments of its own.

Furthermore, there’s a generous storage compartment beneath the rear seat that accommodates dividers as part of the Ford Integrated Tether System. However, the FITS is more notable for the slot on the back of the center console which can accommodate an assortment of accessories ranging from cup holders to a trash bin. The accessories simply clip into the slot and customers get five items – including cup holders, bag hooks, a storage / trash bin, a phone cord organizer, and under seat dividers – for $50.

Speaking of the seats, they’re comfortable and spacious with plenty of bolstering up front. More impressively, the back seat is adult-friendly as there’s up to 36.9 inches (937 mm) of second-row legroom. This means the Maverick has more second-row legroom than the Ranger SuperCrew and F-150 SuperCab.

Another plus is the layout as all controls are straightforward and within easy reach. Of particular note are the physical audio controls and minimalist shifter, which is shared with the Mustang Mach-E.

In terms of equipment, the entry-level Maverick XL is pretty bare bones as it comes as standard with air conditioning, bucket front seats, and a 4.2-inch multi-information display which can double as a digital speedometer. Buyers will also find power windows and locks, a tilt/telescoping steering wheel, and a relatively basic 8-inch infotainment system with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay support. The model also comes with a six-speaker audio system and FordPass Connect, which boasts a 4G LTE Wi-Fi hotspot as well as services such as a vehicle locator, remote start and remote locking / unlocking of the doors.

It also boasts a handful of standard driver assistance systems including auto high-beam headlights and pre-collision assist with automatic emergency braking. There’s also forward collision warning, pedestrian detection and dynamic brake support. Customers can also upgrade to get a lane-keeping system and a blind spot information system with cross-traffic alert.

At the opposite end of the spectrum, the $25,490 Maverick Lariat boasts a larger 6.5-inch multi-information display, a dual-zone automatic climate control system and a passive entry system with a push-button ignition. Other highlights include a leather-wrapped steering wheel, ambient lighting, an 8-way power driver’s seat and a power sliding rear window.

The range-topping variant can also be equipped with options such as heated front seats, an 8-speaker B&O premium audio system and a heated steering wheel. Other extras include a SYNC 3 infotainment system with voice recognition technology as well as driver assistance systems such as lane centering and adaptive cruise control with stop and go.

Hybrid Power Comes Standard

While the Maverick was caught undisguised ahead of its debut, Ford managed to keep its biggest secret under wraps: a standard hybrid powertrain. It consists of a 2.5-liter four-cylinder Atkinson-cycle engine, a compact electric motor, and a small battery pack that is located underneath the cabin to maximize interior space.

This setup enables the truck to produce a combined output of 191 hp (140 kW / 194 PS). Furthermore, the electric motor develops 126 hp (94 kW / 128 PS) and 173 lb-ft (235 Nm) of torque, and can power the truck on electricity alone.

The hybrid variant hasn’t been given an EPA rating yet, but Ford has previously said they’re expecting the model to return 40 mpg (5.9 lt/100 km) city. However, our experience with multiple hybrids suggests the company is being conservative. Driving on rural Tennessee back roads, we averaged 40 mpg without even trying. A day earlier, with some city driving thrown into the mix, we averaged 49 mpg (4.8 lt/100 km).

Fuel economy aside, the hybrid truck has adequate power and its combined horsepower rating is identical to the Santa Cruz’s naturally aspirated 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine. While the powertrain doesn’t seem as refined as hybrid systems from Toyota, it doesn’t really make itself known other than when braking or driving at low speeds. That being said, I became more and more impressed with the hybrid powertrain after repeated encounters.

On the downside, the hybrid comes standard with an electronic continuously variable transmission and is available exclusively with front-wheel drive. The CVT isn’t particularly noteworthy, but the truck has five drive modes – Normal, Eco, Sport, Slippery and Tow/Haul – and Sport livens things up considerably as it attempts to mimic the feel of a traditional automatic. However, the biggest drawback is the lack of all-wheel drive and we hope Ford will find a way of adding an AWD variant in the future.

In the meantime, the only way to get all-wheel drive is to upgrade to the turbocharged 2.0-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder that produces 250 hp (184 kW / 253 PS) and 277 lb-ft (376 Nm) of torque. It offers better performance than the hybrid, but falls short of the Santa Cruz’s optional turbocharged 2.5-liter four-cylinder that develops 281 hp (210 kW / 285 PS) and 311 lb-ft (422 Nm) of torque. However, it’s worth mentioning the Maverick is hundreds of pounds lighter.

Needless to say, the turbocharged engine is less fuel efficient than the hybrid as it carries an EPA rating of 23 mpg (10.2 lt/100 km) city, 30 mpg (7.8 lt/100 km) highway and 26 mpg (9.0 kt/100 km) combined with front-wheel drive. Adding all-wheel drive drops those numbers 1 mpg across the board, but that’s nothing to sneeze at as the larger four-wheel drive Ranger returns 20 mpg (11.7 lt/100 km) city, 24 mpg (9.8 lt/100 km) highway and 22 mpg (10.7 lt/100 km) combined.

The EcoBoost engine is paired to a smooth shifting eight-speed automatic transmission and all-wheel drive is available for an additional $2,220. However, the turbocharged engine is a $1,085 option and this means owners will need to shell out a total of $3,305 to upgrade to all-weather traction.

The Maverick isn’t a hardcore off-roader, but the optional all-wheel drive system enables the truck to venture off the beaten path. We weren’t able to test the pickup to extremes, but it didn’t have any problems traversing a trail similar to what you’d find on your way to a remote camp site. The truck was also able to climb a rocky hill without difficulty, thanks in part to its 8.6 inches (218 mm) of ground clearance.

Speaking of all-wheel drive, XLT and Lariat variants can be equipped with an FX4 Off-Road Package. It adds a revised suspension, additional underbody protection and unique 17-inch wheels wrapped in all-terrain rubber. The package also includes front tow hooks, an upgraded cooling system, Hill Descent Control, and a revised drive mode system which replaces Sport and Eco modes with Sand and Mud/Ruts settings.

Truck Capability Meets Crossover Comfort

Back on pavement, the Maverick’s unibody construction shines as the model rides on the C2 platform which is shared with the Bronco Sport and Escape. This pays big dividends in terms of ride and comfort as the Maverick drives more like a crossover than a truck.

It’s remarkable what Ford engineers were able to accomplish as the suspension, which features MacPherson struts and a twistbeam (hybrid) or multi-link (gas) rear, soaks up imperfections with little more than a thump. The ride quality is undeniably impressive and there wasn’t even the slightest hint of jostling during our time with multiple different models.

Handling is also impressive for a truck as high-speed cornering felt secure and drama-free. In fact, the Maverick felt capable of dealing with far more challenging scenarios than I was comfortable throwing at it.

That being said, the experience isn’t particularly rewarding as the electric power-assisted steering system isn’t very engaging. It’s responsive, but not quite as nice as the system in the Santa Cruz. On the bright side, the truck has a 40 foot (12.2 meter) turning circle and this makes maneuvering in parking lots a breeze.

Tow Time

Both gas and hybrid models have a towing capacity of 2,000 lbs (907 kg), but all-wheel drive variants can be equipped with a 4K Tow Package which doubles the capacity to 4,000 lbs (1,814 kg). It includes a trailer hitch receiver, a revised drive ratio, a trailer brake controller, and an upgraded cooling system with a higher capacity radiator, a transmission oil cooler and an upgraded cooling fan.

Ford is confident in the truck’s capability and we used the Maverick to tow an Airstream Basecamp 16, which weighs 2,650 lbs (1,202 kg). Our experience with the camper revealed the truck has plenty of power for towing as the Airstream wasn’t overly taxing on the engine and merging onto the highway wasn’t a stressful experience. That being said, ride quality takes a hit as things become more unsettled, but this was to be expected.

While it’s no F-350, the Maverick can tow small- to medium-sized trailers and boats. Of course, the Santa Cruz has the edge here as the turbocharged all-wheel drive variant can tow up to 5,000 lbs (2,268 kg).

Cheap Is Cool

No matter how you slice it, the 2022 Maverick is a remarkably impressive truck and it’s amazing what Ford was able to accomplish considering pricing starts at $19,995 before a $1,495 destination charge.

Of course, most consumers will want to upgrade to the mid-level XLT trim which starts at $22,280 before factoring in the destination fee. That’s still remarkable value and buyers will be rewarded with a classier cabin, cruise control, and 17-inch aluminum wheels as steelies aren’t for everyone.

Besides being affordable, the truck offers mind-boggling fuel-efficiency with the hybrid powertrain and good performance with the EcoBoost engine. Ride and handling is also crossover-like and the Maverick can easily transport four adults in comfort.

While there’s obviously a lot to love, there are also some shortcomings as the Hyundai Santa Cruz offers a more powerful turbocharged engine, a higher towing capacity, and a more upscale interior with high-tech goodies. The Maverick also allows a fair amount of road noise into the cabin, although an acoustic windshield on the range-topping Lariat helps a bit.

Furthermore, one of the models we drove had an irritating rattle coming from the dash. We’ll chalk this up to a quirk as none of our other test vehicles suffered a similar problem, but quality control issues have plagued a handful of recent launches including the highly-anticipated Bronco.

All in all, the Maverick is an undeniably appealing pickup and probably one of the most exciting entry-level vehicles in recent memory.

more photos…

Picture credits: Michael Gauthier for CarScoops

What Is The Jaguar F-Type Project 7 Like On A 2,000-Mile Long Road Trip?

Global production of the Jaguar F-Type Project 7 was capped at just 250 examples and among the fortunate few that own one is Harry Metcalfe. Unlike other owners, he isn’t afraid of driving the car.

Recently, the former editor of Evo Magazine embarked on a roadtrip in his F-Type Project 7 that saw him travel from the UK to the French Riviera as part of a 2,000-mile journey. The two videos below show the first two parts of his journey.

Read Also: 2022 Jaguar F-Type Ditches 4-Cylinder And V6 Engines, Goes V8-Only

[embedded content]

In part one, Metcalfe traveled from his home to the 2021 Hampton Court Concours. Only the first third of the video actually shows him driving the F-Type Project 7 while the rest of it shows him walking around the Concours and checking out all the cars on display.

Among the highlights on display at the show were an orange McLaren F1 GTR, Aston Martin Vanquish Zagato Shooting Brake, Porsche 917K, the famed Aston Martin Bulldog, Lamborghini Countach, Ferrari F50, LaFerrari, and the bespoke Pagani Zonda 760VR, a car that started life out as a Zonda F Roadster which Metcalfe actually drove back in the day.

The second video shows Metcalfe starting his French leg of the journey from a hotel near Calais before blasting down the Autoroute on his way to Antibes. Most of this leg was nothing but highway driving but towards the end, he headed away from the motorway to experience the famed Route Napoleon where he could drive the F-Type Project 7 the way it was designed to be driven.

[embedded content]

For GREAT deals on a new or used Toyota check out Premier Toyota of Amherst TODAY!

Most Disappointing Cars I’ve Driven #2: Audi RS 3

I took a long pause between writing the word ‘Audi’ at the top of this page, and ‘RS 3’ after it. Because this was nearly about the TT RS, and could easily have been about the RS Q3 crossover. Come to think of it, it could have been about the RS 5 or any number of other uber-fast Audis that aren’t the R8, which all suffer from the same affliction. They’re fast, attractive and desirable, but simply not as much fun to drive as they look like they should be.

But I’ve settled on the RS 3 because any moment now Audi is about to drop the next-generation 2022 RS 3 hatchback and the RS 3 sedan that’ll come to North America, and they look like they’re going to be a whole lot more satisfying to thread down a great road.

My last ‘disappointing cars’ piece was on the Alfa 4C, and it definitely got a few people upset, so I want to be clear that there is plenty I do like about Audi’s RS cars. In fact, I’ll happily admit to liking Audis, period. I’ve run two A6 Allroads, two A4 Avants and a Q5, and enjoyed them all. I’m a big fan of the regular A3 and Q7, and I’ve always thought the most basic TT, excused from the impossible task of trying to be a 718 Cayman rival, is actually okay.

Read: The Most Disappointing Cars I’ve Driven #1: Alfa Romeo 4C

But none of them made any promises of being great drivers cars. They were just nicely built, comfortable and capable premium cars. And I’ve always felt that was Audi’s sweet spot. The more they tried to push the performance angle, the less satisfying they become.

Which isn’t to say I don’t see the appeal of an RS Audi. I think Audi’s RS designers have got the visual attitude, the street presence, the swagger of their cars absolutely licked. Brands like Jaguar, that are great at the chassis stuff, always seem to make a mess of things when they push hard with the performance visuals, like a bunch of 60-year old men trying to work out why K-pop is so massive (to be fair, I don’t understand it either).

But Audi Sport is a master at the details. Everything from the design of the wheels to the stitching on the upholstery to the typeface on the dials is always on-point on an RS car. That stuff might not make a car better to drive, but it certainly makes it better to own, because whether you’re lifting the garage door, or just cruising in traffic enjoying another great interior, the feel-good factor is always sky high.

As it is when you thumb the starter button and hear the 2.5-litre five cylinder motor spin up. In Europe, where that engine is available in the TT RS and RS Q3 as well as the RS 3, particulate filters might have robbed some of the growl in recent years, but it’s still got a heap more character than any of its rivals.

Related: America’s 2022 Audi RS3 Has More Power Than The Euro-Spec Model At 401-HP

Remember when you got to choose between a VTEC screamer, a punchy turbo motor, lusty six or loony rotary? There’s so much depressing uniformity about the engine offerings in modern small and medium cars, which are increasingly powered by four-cylinder turbo motors (and it’s only going to get worse with the switch to electric power), that it’s a real pleasure to come across something so unique as the RS 3’s straight-five.

So it’s great to hear that the EA850 inline five is carried over to the new RS 3. In Europe it’ll make the same 394 hp as before, but 250 rpm earlier in the rev range, and torque is up 15 lb ft to 369 lb ft. But in the U.S, presumably so Audi’s marketing department can crow about a power figure that starts with a 4, the sedan comes with 401 hp. Bank on getting to 62mph in around 3.8 seconds in both versions, and, if you pay extra to have the 155mph speed limiter raised, the ability to hit 180mph.

Brands like Jaguar, that are great at the chassis stuff, always seem to make a mess of things when they push hard with the performance visuals, like a bunch of 60-year old men trying to work out why K-pop is so massive (to be fair, I don’t understand it either).

[embedded content]

The downside of course, is that more cylinders means more weight on the nose. Not as much weight as the stodgy 2011 RS3, mind, thanks to a switch from a cast iron block to aluminium, but despite its fat front tires, the 2016 RS 3 was prone to understeer if you pushed too hard in situations where rivals would happily pivot. Factor in the slightly dead steering, and you had a car that could cover ground quickly and safely in all weather conditions, and was fun, up to a point, but which didn’t quite deliver the excitement or engagement it promised. It was good, but not Mercedes-AMG A45 good, or as good as the BMW M2 you could buy for a few dollars more.

Which is why news from Ingolstadt that the new RS 3 is the first of series of performance Audis to gain a new four-wheel drive system is so welcome. The key component is the new Torque Splitter, essentially a pair of electronically controlled clutches, one on each rear driveshaft, enabling swift torque distribution between the two rear wheels.

Much as I like a bit of oversteer, I’m not so bothered about the inevitable RS Torque Rear ‘drift mode’ because while those features sound good in test drive reports, and are probably fun in an empty parking lot, much like launch control systems, they’re almost completely irrelevant in day-today driving.

But the ability to send more torque to the outside rear wheel and help the car turn promises to make the new RS3 a much more dynamic machine, and maybe even give it some of that dancing-on-its toes feel that made the old Mitsubishi Evos such great fun to drive. Here’s hoping, because with that fantastic five cylinder engine and classy RS interior, it wouldn’t take much to turn the RS 3 from disappointing to downright brilliant.

more photos…

The McLaren 720S Spider Is Sublime, But Is It The Supercar To Go For?

While the McLaren 720S Spider has been on the market for quite some time, Harry Metcalfe only recently had the opportunity to feature it on his YouTube channel. As always, his review is comprehensive and covers the exterior and interior design of the car before he heads out onto the street to see what it is like to drive.

Metcalfe opens up his review by mentioning that in recent months he’s also had the opportunity to drive the Lamborghini Huracan Evo and Ferrari F8 Tributo, allowing him to easily compare the 720S to them. He is immediately impressed with how refined the 720S Spider is, commenting that its cabin is quieter than a Porsche 911 and that its transmission works seamlessly when left in automatic mode. He is also very fond of the steering wheel and the digital instrument cluster.

Watch Also: It’s Very Hard To Find Something Wrong With The McLaren 720S Spider

When he starts to push the car a little harder, he does notice that there is some turbo lag, particularly if you’re driving it in comfort mode without using the paddle shifters. He adds that the rear wheels frequently struggle for traction but that’s not surprising consider how much power the car has.

The steering of the 720S Spider is also superb, Metcalfe reports. He says the electro-hydraulic system is much better than the steerings offered by Ferrari and Lamborghini, going as far as to suggest that it is “Lotus-like.”

While the 720S is a very expensive car, prices of lightly-used examples have plummeted in recent years, making it a bit of a bargain compared to its rivals.

[embedded content]

For GREAT deals on a new or used Ford check out Santa Maria Ford TODAY!

Is The New BMW M3 Competition Better To Drive Than The Alfa Romeo Giulia QV?

The first reviews of the controversially-styled 2021 BMW M3 are out and in this clip, Piston Heads compares it to one of the finest sports sedans of recent years, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio.

Featured in this video is the flagship M3 Competition variant, albeit not one equipped with the optional all-wheel drive system. It is finished in grey and if you can ignore the massive kidney grilles, certainly has an aggressive shape and lots of road presence. Does it look as good as the Alfa Romeo? Of course not.

Powering the M3 Competition is a 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged inline-six with 503 hp, matching up perfectly with the Giulia Quadrifoglio that rocks a 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6 with the exact same output. Both are rear-wheel drive and use automatic transmissions, rather than dual-clutch gearboxes.

Read Also: Ah To Be A 2022 BMW M3 Touring Test Driver, Running Rings In The Snow

One of the first comments the reviewer makes about the M3 relates to its suspension setup. He says that even when driven in Comfort mode, the ride is firm, and questions whether buyers in the UK will ever be able to change the suspension into its even firmer Sport and Sport+ settings. He also isn’t a big fan of how the new engine sounds but does say it is very, very fast.

Compared to the previous-generation M3, this new one handles much better and delivers a more refined driving experience. Sure, the eight-speed automatic transmission isn’t as snappy as some dual-clutch ones, but it does the job.

However, can the all-new M3 Competition beat the Giulia Quadrifoglio? Watch the full review to find out.

[embedded content]

For GREAT deals on a new or used Harley check out Shasta Harley Davidson TODAY!

What’s The Ferrari Roma Like To Drive Through The Canyons?

The Roma doesn’t just have unique styling when compared to other Ferraris, but it also drives in its own unique way.

Ferrari introduced the Roma as a middle ground between the Portofino and the F8 Tributo and journalists in the U.S., including Matt Farah, have recently had their first opportunity to put it through its paces. The Roma is marketed as a grand tourer but it performs wonderfully through the canyons and feels like a proper sports car.

It is powered by a 3.9-liter twin-turbocharged V8 that is rated at 612 hp and 561 lb-ft (761 Nm) of torque and while this engine is used in other Ferraris, the Italian car manufacturer did modify it for use in the Roma and have given it a different character. In fact, Farah says that it actually sounds better than the one in the F8 Tributo.

Watch Also: Is The All-New Roma One Of The Best GTs Ferrari Has Ever Made?

Coupled to the twin-turbo V8 is an eight-speed dual-clutch transmission. This gearbox snaps through the gears with blistering pace but needs to be driven in manual mode if you want to get the most of it. When left in automatic mode, it responds in a very relaxed manner.

Key rivals to the Ferrari Roma including the Mercedes-AMG GT C, Bentley Continental GT and Porsche 911 Turbo and while they’re all excellent, they don’t turn heads quite like the Ferrari does.

As you’d expect, though, it’s quite pricey and can get substantially more expensive once you start ticking the option boxes. As standard, the Roma starts at $218,000, but the car tested by Farah had an MSRP of $316,000.

[embedded content]

For GREAT deals on used vehicles check out My Car Park.com TODAY!

The Audi RS2 Is A Porsche-Built Amazing Oddity From The 1990s

The Audi RS2 is one of the automaker’s most intriguing performance models and Doug DeMuro recently picked up the keys to one.

In the 1990s, Audi was struggling and decided to launch a new performance car. To make the RS2 a reality, it recruited the help of Porsche and set about creating a go-fast version of the 80 Avant. This was the result.

Watch Also: The Audi RS2 Is An Incredible Machine That You Can Now Enjoy In The U.S.

Porsche outfitted Audi’s 2.2-liter inline-five engine with a larger turbocharger, a larger intercooler, a bespoke ECU and a new camshaft, among others. All up, it delivered 311 hp and 302 lb-ft (410 Nm) of torque, which were pretty impressive figures for a station wagon in the early 1990s. With a 0-60 mph (96 km/h) time of 4.8 seconds, DeMuro says it was so quick that it took Audi a decade to produce a road-legal car that could out-accelerate the RS2.

It’s not just the engine that Porsche worked on. The RS2 also features Porsche brakes, wheels from a 911 Turbo, and a bespoke suspension setup, again done by Porsche. In fact, the RS2 was actually built at Porsche’s factory.

So, why did Audi tap Porsche on the shoulder to build the RS2? Well, it’s quite simple. At the time, Audi didn’t have the reputation needed to produce a high-performance street car like the RS2, despite its motorsport success. By linking up with Porsche, it got the credibility it needed. As for Porsche, it agreed to the deal as it was near bankruptcy at the time and simply needed the money.

[embedded content]

For GREAT deals on a new or used Toyota check out Claremont Toyota TODAY!

You Can Take A McLaren Senna GTR To A McDonald’s Drive-Thru – But It’s Gonna Be Tricky

<!––>

<!––>

McLaren has built some pretty remarkable cars over the last decade and the Senna GTR is one of its absolute finest. To give us an excellent idea of what it is like to drive it, the Novitec Group put together a rather amusing review.

The first section highlights some of the wild aerodynamic components of the limited-run hypercar before the presenter jumps inside and discusses some of the features in the cabin. He then heads out onto a circuit for a brief test. While he isn’t able to push the Senna GTR to its limits, the video does provide us with an excellent idea of what it is like to drive a car as phenomenal as this.

Watch Also: Bruno Senna Pushes The McLaren Senna GTR To Its Limits

Things get particularly entertaining towards the end of the video, when the Senna GTR is taken through a McDonald’s Drive-Thru. While it isn’t the most convenient car for something like this, it gets the job done. Well, almost…

The Senna GTR is powered by a twin-turbocharged 4.0-liter V8 pumping out 814 hp and 590 lb-ft (800 Nm) of torque, 25 hp more than the road-legal Senna.

As the Senna GTR was created to provide the ultimate on-track performance, it has a fully adjustable suspension that allows drivers to tweak the anti-roll bar stiffness, ride height and spring stiffness. Thanks to its wild aero pack, it also produces 1,000 kg (2,205 lbs) of downforce, allowing it to take corners at mind-bending speeds.

[embedded content]

What Makes The Original Acura NSX So Desirable And Valuable?

The Honda NSX, sold in North America under the Acura brand, is a true icon of the performance car world and in this clip, Doug DeMuro explains just what makes it so impressive.

This particular NSX is a 1994 example and has roughly 47,500 miles (76,443 km) on the clock. It also happens to be available for sale.

The listing over at Cars & Bids reveals that this NSX is a JDM-spec model that was only recently imported into the United States from the selling dealership. While it is not currently registered or titled in the U.S., it comes with Japanese export certificates and all of its important documents, including EPA exemptions and U.S. Customs clearance.

Read Also: Honda NSX Leaves Australia For Good Having Sold ZERO Units This Year

Honda produced the first generation NSX between 1990 and 2005. It is powered by an all-aluminum 3.0-liter naturally aspirated V6 that is good for 276 hp and 217 lb-ft (294 Nm) of torque, which are sent to the rear wheels courtesy of a five-speed manual transmission. Formula One legend Ayrton Senna famously played a key role in the car’s development.

Prior to being imported into the United States, the car had all of its fluids and filters replaced and was fitted with new brake pads. In addition, it is being sold with service documentation from its tenure in Japan.

Throughout his review, DeMuro explains the usual array of “quirks and features” that we’re used to seeing from his videos. He also drives the NSX towards the end of the clip. As you would imagine, he is very impressed with it.

[embedded content]