High iQ: Why Aston Martin’s Cygnet City Car Was A Smarter Buy Than Its Toyota Donor (And The DB9)

When Aston Martin formally announced the Cygnet city car at the Geneva Motor Show back in 2010, plenty of people thought the company had lost the plot.

There on the stand, nestled between the company’s sexy sports cars and GTs, was a dumpy-looking city car powered by a feeble 1.3-liter inline-four. If it looked familiar beneath the Aston grille and the lashings of leather covering the interior surfaces, that was because the Cygnet was essentially a tarted-up Toyota iQ, which would later be sold as the Scion iQ in North America. And to the shock of many showgoers, Aston was deadly serious about building it.

To be fair to Aston, and the Cygnet’s biggest fan, then-CEO Ulrich Bez, you could see the logic behind the move. It wanted to offer its existing customers looking for a well-equipped city runaround a reason not to shop elsewhere, much like Porsche created the Cayenne to hang on to Porsche customers who needed something bigger than a 911. Downsizing was only just taking off, so Aston was actually ahead of the curve.

The British automaker was also looking to entice new customers to the brand, while angling to meet new rules on fleet emissions targets. With no giant parent company churning out frugal economy cars to help offset the filthy muck coming out of its V12s’ tailpipes, Aston saw the Cygnet as an opportunity to bring its CO2 average down.

Related: Aston Martin’s V8-Powered Cygnet Shows That Anything Is Possible

But all that said, was anyone really going to spend £30,995 ($43,655) on a posh Toyota iQ when you could buy an actual thing for less than half the money? Unfortunately for Aston, not many people did. There was bullish talk of 4,000 units per year sales targets when production kicked off in 2011, but by 2013 the ugly duckling got the chop due to limited interest and the impending death of its iQ donor, having found only a couple of hundred buyers.

The Depreciation-Proof Aston Martin

However, a decade on, that crazy-money Aston city car doesn’t look like it was such a crazy buy after all. The Car and Classic classified website currently lists four Cygnets for sale, all priced between £34,000 and £36,895 ($47,900-52,000), while official dealer Aston Martin Cheltenham has a 24,000-mile example up for £37,950 ($53,450), and independent dealer, FTC Prestige & Performance, is looking for a punchy £42,650 ($60,000) for a 9600-mile car. Presuming those cars change hands for vaguely close to their asking prices, those numbers represent a significant gain over the new price back in 2011.

Okay, so technically, if you adjust for inflation they’ve lost a couple of grand, and some would have cost more than the £30,995 base price when new because they were fitted with the available CVT automatic transmission or other options. But you only have to look at what happened to values of the donor iQ over the same period for confirmation of how well the Cygnet has fared.

Back in 2011 a 1.3-liter iQ would have cost you around £11,500 in the UK ($16,200). But a decade later that same Toyota shoebox is only worth around £4,000-5,000 ($5,600-7,000), or a little more with the more desirable CVT transmission.

Other Astons Haven’t Fared So Well

Now take a look at the other Aston Martins you could have bought in 2011. That gorgeous V12-powered DB9 that would have set you back £117,000 ($165,000)? Unless it’s an extremely low-miler, it’s probably worth £50-55k ($70-77k) today, meaning it has lost almost 60 per cent of its original value.

The little Vantage has survived slightly better. A Vantage S coupe with 20k miles originally costing £103,000 ($145,000) might go for £55k ($78k) at an independent dealer today. Don’t worry, like you, we know which we’d have spent the last 10 years driving. But those figures certainly show the Cygnet in a more favorable light.

And with the benefit of hindsight, it’s hard not to see the Cygnet as a sound idea that the world wasn’t quite ready for. Which isn’t to say Aston got the product right. There was a lot to like about the iQ, including its insanely small turning circle. But I don’t think it was the right base for a baby Aston. To my mind, if the company had been able to hang on just a couple of years longer and base its city-car aspirations around BMW’s cool, all-electric i3 that rocked up in 2013, the Cygnet story could have turned out quite differently.

For GREAT deals on a new or used Chevrolet check out Martin Chevrolet TODAY!

Woman Who Sued Body Shop Over Aston Martin Repair Bill Now Ordered To Pay $250,000

A judge rejected claims by the owner of a crashed Aston Martin DB9 that a body shop tried to scam her, and was ordered to pay more than CA$330,000 or about US$250,000 in current exchange rates.

The three-year legal battle between Jessica Liu, the owner of a crashed Aston Martin DB9, MCL Motor Cars, a dealership based in Vancouver, and Burrard Autostrasse, the body shop in question, came to an end as the owner now has to pay almost twice the value of her car.

Read More: Owner Of Crashed Aston Martin DB9 Refuses To Pay $100,000 Repair Bill

Jessica Liu crashed her 2014 Aston Martin DB9 (worth around CA$200,000 at the time) in December 2015 into a rock and had the car towed to Burrard Autostrasse. Liu, who only had basic insurance, received a formal initial estimate of between CA$85,000 and CA$132,000 Canadian (US65,000 to US$100,000) as the car had suffered structural damage. Liu paid a deposit of CA$50,000 (US$38,000) but refused to pay the remaining sum, filing instead a lawsuit against the auto shop and the dealership.

In her lawsuit, Liu claimed that she had been taken advantage of due to her lack of English skills and perception of wealth, and accused the dealership and the auto shop of breach of contract and collusion between the two defendants, Richmond News reports.

Since the owner didn’t pick up the car, Burrard Autostrasse stored the Aston Martin DB9 indoors for protection and charged her CA$200 per day.

In her lawsuit, Liu was seeking CA$300,000 Canadian (US$226,000) as compensation as she claimed she suffered a long list of personal injuries that included depression and anxiety, sleeping disorders, low self-esteem among others. She went through four different law firms before eventually represented herself in court.

In her ruling of the case, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Nitya Iyer found there was no evidence and no legal basis for any of Liu’s claims. The judge ordered Liu to settle not only the unpaid cost of the repairs and indoor storage fees, which amount to about US$330,000 Canadian (US$250,000), but to pay some of Burrard’s legal costs as well.

“Ms. Liu’s claim is meritless and she has made resolution of the issue virtually impossible,” Iyer wrote, as reported by TheBreaker. “Objectively assessed, her allegations of fraud, conspiracy, fraudulent misrepresentation, or breach of fiduciary duty are without legal foundation and she should not have advanced them. It is clear that Ms. Liu’s conduct of the litigation has been frustrating and extremely unpleasant for Burrard.”

“Notably, over $97,000 of this amount represented the cost of the parts Burrard purchased from Aston Martin to perform the repair. Burrard’s labour cost was about $12,000, or just under 9% of the total invoice,” the judge continued.

“She claims damages for various personal injuries and for travel to and from China, along with the value of a new vehicle, $300,000 and increased costs,” said Iyer’s verdict. “The stated legal basis for her claims is coercion, breach of fiduciary duty and extortion of her as a ‘financially well off’ person whose first language is not English. None of the evidence before me supports these allegations.”

 

Note: Stock Aston Martin pictures

For GREAT deals on a new or used INFINITI check out Infiniti of Kearny Mesa TODAY!